You are here

Shanks and Joplin Reply

Reports of the National Center for Science Education
Title: 
Shanks and Joplin Reply
Author(s): 
Niall Shanks and Karl Joplin
Volume: 
21
Issue: 
3–4
Year: 
2001
Date: 
May–August
Page(s): 
16
This version might differ slightly from the print publication.

A traditional Christian explanation of the origin of things is supernatural design and creation ex nihilo. We are grateful for Michael Behe's suggestion that we give consideration to alternative hypotheses concerning design — perhaps through the modification of pre-existing materials. Behe cites Kenneth Miller, who asks us to envision supernatural intelligent design proceeding by some cunning manipulation of events at the quantum level "scientifically undetectable to us."

The qualification that the way design is effected be "scientifically undetectable to us" is crucial. The trouble here is that there is an infinity of alternative design hypotheses (one designer did it, two designers did it, three did it, and so on), and an imaginative theorist could no doubt come up with many design scenarios, all of which are scientifically undetectable to us. Being scientifically undetectable, they are, of course, evidentially ungrounded.

Notwithstanding this, Behe's central claim is that the fact of design (regardless of how it was effected) can be empirically detected in observable features of physical systems. Such features cannot be explained, he contends, on the basis of mindless natural processes. In our earlier essays on Behe's ideas, we introduced the idea of biochemical redundant complexity. A redundantly complex biochemical system is one that contains redundant subsystems — subsystems that can be removed without complete loss of function achieved by the system as a whole. Behe has conceded the existence of redundant complexity (see his "Self-organization and irreducible complexity: A reply to Shanks and Joplin," Philosophy of Science 2000; 67: 155–62).

The admission is crucial. Reduce the redundancy in a redundantly complex system to the point where the further removal of a subsystem causes the system as a whole to lose function completely, and a redundantly complex system has evolved into an irreducibly complex system. Irreducibly complex systems are thus limiting cases of redundantly complex systems. Mutations resulting in gene duplication can give rise to redundancy. Mutations transforming functional genes into pseudogenes can reduce redundancy to the point where a system once manifesting redundant complexity is now irreducibly complex. (An extended discussion of these ideas can be found in our essay, "Behe, biochemistry, and the invisible hand", Philo 2001; 4: 54–67). There is no need for any additional mechanisms and agents, be they supernatural or merely of the space alien variety, that are scientifically undetectable to us. Contrary to Behe, the design hypothesis cannot simply be validated by pointing to physical systems manifesting irreducible complexity.

About the Author(s): 

Niall Shanks
Department of Philosophy
East Tennessee State University
Johnson City TN 37614

Karl H Joplin
Department of Biological Sciences
East Tennessee State University
Johnson City TN 37614