You are here

Petitions!

Josh NelsonJosh NelsonJosh RosenauJosh Rosenau

Review: Creationism and the Conflict over Evolution

Year: 
2010
Issue: 
5
Title: 
Creationism and the Conflict over Evolution

As a theologianBook cover: Wiley - Creationism at the University of St Thomas (St Paul, Minnesota), Tatha Wiley engages Darwinian thought in order to gain insight into the doctrines of Christianity.

Date: 
September-October
Author(s): 
Tatha Wiley
Eugene (OR): Cascade Books, 2009. 154 pages
Page(s): 
35-36
Reviewer: 
Daniel K Brannan
About the Author(s): 

Daniel K Brannan is Professor of Biology at Abilene Christian University.

AUTHOR’S ADDRESS
Daniel K Brannan
Department of Biology
Abilene Christian University
ACU Box 27868
Abilene TX 79699–7868

Media Type: 
This version might differ slightly from the print publication.

Review: The Genesis Enigma

Year: 
2010
Title: 
The Genesis Enigma: Why the Bible is Scientifically Accurate
Issue: 
4

Andrew Parker, "The Genesis Enigma" book coverevolutionary biologist and Honorary Research Fellow at Green Templeton College at Oxford University, is perhaps best known in scientific circles for his “light-switch t

Author(s): 
Andrew Parker
Date: 
July-August
Page(s): 
36-37
New York: Penguin, 2009. 284 pages
Reviewer: 
Alexander Glass

References

Parker A. 2003. In the Blink of an Eye. New York: Basic Books.


About the Author(s): 

Alexander Glass is an invertebrate paleontologist specializing in the evolutionary history of brittlestars. He is an instructor in the Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences in the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University. He spends his free time obsessively thinking about religion, evolution, and pseudoscience.

AUTHOR’S ADDRESS
Alexander Glass
Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences
Duke University
Box 90227
Durham NC 27708

This version might differ slightly from the print publication.
Media Type: 

How Do I Read the Bible? Let Me Count the Ways

en español

by Peter M. J. Hess, Director, Religious Community Outreach

Opponents of evolution often claim that their opposition is based upon a lack of supporting scientific evidence. In reality, their objection frequently stems from a separate issue: how to read the Bible and interpret the view of nature it projects.

Pages

Subscribe to science & religion