You are hereReview: Darwin's IllnessYear: 2009 Title: Darwin's Illness Issue: 6 Date: Forthcoming Poor Darwin; one has to feel sorry for him, not just because he was ill so much of the time, but also because the world now knows so much about his heart palpitations, the color of his urine, and his bowel movements! But the man himself seems to have relished all the details of his symptoms, set out for many years in a diary and in lists sent to an unending supply of doctors and quacks. He is famous for taking "cures" at expensive spas, such as the one run by Dr James Gully (principally involving cold baths and a strict diet). Gainesville (FL): University of Florida Press, 2008. 337 pages Page(s): 40–41 Media Type: This version might differ slightly from the print publication. Review: The Young Charles DarwinYear: 2010 Title: The Young Charles Darwin Issue: 1–2 Date: January–April New Haven (CT): Yale University Press, 2009. 276 pages Page(s): 27–28 Media Type: This version might differ slightly from the print publication. Review: The Darwin MythYear: 2009 Issue: 5 Title: The Darwin Myth: The Life and Lies of Charles Darwin Using that “life and lies” formula in the subtitle of this anti-Darwin book was not a wise move by Discovery Institute Senior Fellow Benjamin Wiker. It invites unfavorable comparison to a similarly titled book about a similarly celebrated white-bearded English sage with an ugly nose. I mean, of course, The Life and Lies of Albus Dumbledore, by Rita Skeeter, a book within a book in the Harry Potter series. Date: September–October Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2009. 196 pages. Page(s): 42–43 topics: Media Type: This version might differ slightly from the print publication. RNCSE 29 (2)
Issue: 2 Year: 2009 Date: March–April Articles available online are listed below.
Click "Print Edition Contents" for list of articles in the print edition. Media Type: Review: Render Unto DarwinYear: 2009 Title: Render Unto Darwin: Philosophical Aspects of the Christian Right’s Crusade Against Science Issue: 2 Philosopher of science James H Fetzer argues that creationism, both in its fundamentalist young-earth form and in the guise of allegedly more sophisticated “intelligent design”, fails to qualify as science, and therefore is not a respectable theoretical alternative to evolutionary science. As the book’s subtitle implies, Fetzer holds that the attack on evolution is part of a comprehensive effort by the religious and political right to undermine scientific rationality and the authority of science. Date: March–April Chicago: Open Court, 2007. 201 pages Page(s): 42–43 ReferencesChalmers AF. 1999. What is This Thing Called Science? 3rd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Gale G. 1979. Theory of Science: An Introduction to the History, Logic, and Philosophy of Science. New York: McGraw-Hill. Goldberg M. 2007. Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism. New York: WW Norton. Hedges C. 2006. American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America. New York: The Free Press. Laudan L. 1988. The demise of the demarcation problem. In: Ruse M, editor. But is it Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy. Buffalo (NY): Prometheus. p 337–50. Kitcher P. 1982. Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. Kitcher P. 2007. Living With Darwin: Evolution, Design, and the Future of Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pennock R. 1999. Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. Ruse M. 1982. Darwinism Defended. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley. Sarkar S. 2007. Doubting Darwin? Creationist Designs on Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell. Shanks N. 2004. God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. This version might differ slightly from the print publication. Media Type: Response to "Winning their Hearts and Minds"Title: Response to “Winning their Hearts and Minds” Issue: 2 In the religiously created, artificial creationism/evolution controversy, as in every social political conflict, there are basically three groups: the hard-core pro (non-theistic and theistic evolutionists), the hard-core con, and those in the middle consisting of the undecided and the apathetic — those who do not really care one way or the other. To convince people to side with a specific point of a view, arguments are framed by debaters not for the hard core but for the middle. Year: 2009 Date: March–April Page(s): 33–34 This version might differ slightly from the print publication. Media Type: Winning Their Hearts and Minds: Who Should Speak for Evolution?Title: Winning Their Hearts and Minds: Who Should Speak for Evolution? Issue: 2 Book reviews in recent issues of RNCSE have showcased a growing number of authors and reviewers who advocate some form of theistic evolution. However, other recent books by Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and other militant atheist advocates of evolution have attracted much more media attention — naturally, since extreme views always sell more newspapers than moderate ones. Year: 2009 Date: March–April Page(s): 30–32 This version might differ slightly from the print publication. Media Type: RNCSE 29 (1)
Issue: 1 Year: 2009 Date: January–February Articles available online are listed below.
Click "Print Edition Contents" for list of articles in the print edition. Media Type: Review: Negotiating DarwinYear: 2009 Title: Negotiating Darwin: The Vatican Confronts Evolution, 1877-1902 Issue: 1 Date: January—February On both the popular and scholarly levels, the appreciation of the Roman Catholic Church’s stance with respect to the theory of biological evolution has been ambiguous. On the one hand, it is sometimes assumed that the Church that had rushed to judgment on heliocentrism in the case of Galileo would not have hesitated to pounce on a theory that both undercut a literal reading of Genesis and reduced human beings to the status of animals. Baltimore (MD): The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006. 336 pages Page(s): 29—30 Media Type: This version might differ slightly from the print publication. Pages |